Modular and Submodular Properties of the Sum and Max Functions
1. Introduction
In optimization and combinatorics, set functions play a central role.
Given a finite ground set , a set function is any mapping:
Two of the most common examples are:
-
Sum function:
-
Max function:
for some fixed weights .
These functions exhibit interesting structural properties known as modularity and submodularity, which are fundamental concepts in combinatorial optimization.
2. Modularity and Submodularity
Definition
A function is submodular if for all subsets ,
If equality always holds, then is modular.
2.1 The Sum Function is Modular
Consider
Then for any ,
Thus, the sum function satisfies equality for all pairs , and therefore it is modular.
2.2 The Max Function is Submodular
Now consider
We must show that for all ,
Let
Then
and
Hence,
Therefore, the inequality holds for all , so is submodular.
3. Summary
Function | Expression | Property | Reason |
---|---|---|---|
Sum | Modular | Equality holds in the submodular inequality | |
Max | Submodular | Inequality holds, with possible strict inequality |
Both functions are monotone (non-decreasing with respect to inclusion), but only the sum function is exactly modular.
The max function is strictly submodular unless the maximum element is shared across all subsets.
Keywords: modular function, submodular function, combinatorial optimization, set function, convexity