Friday, February 27, 2026

Relation of Polar and Fenchel transforms

Relation of Polar and Fenchel transforms

Polar and Fenchel Transforms of a Gauge

Let X,YX, Y be a dual pair with bilinear pairing x,y\langle x, y \rangle.
Let CXC \subset X be a nonempty convex set containing 00.

We define two main objects:

  • The gauge function (Minkowski functional):
    γC(x):=inf{t>0:xtC}. \gamma_C(x) := \inf\{t > 0 : x \in tC\}.

  • The indicator function:
    δC(y)={0,yC,+,yC. \delta_{C^\circ}(y) = \begin{cases} 0, & y \in C^\circ, \\ +\infty, & y \notin C^\circ. \end{cases}

We also define three fundamental transformations:

  • The polar transform of a set:
    C:={yY:x,y1;xC}. C^\circ := \{ y \in Y : \langle x, y \rangle \le 1 ; \forall x \in C\}.

  • The polar transform of a gauge:
    k(y):=inf{μ0:x,yμk(x);xX}. k^\circ(y) := \inf\{ \mu \ge 0 : \langle x, y \rangle \le \mu k(x) ; \forall x \in X\}.

  • The Fenchel transform (Fenchel conjugate) of a convex function:
    f(y):=sup{x,yf(x):xX}. f^*(y) := \sup\{ \langle x, y \rangle - f(x) : x \in X \}.

In this note, we prove the following results:

  1. Polar transform of a gauge: (γC)=γC(\gamma_C)^\circ = \gamma_{C^\circ}.

  2. Fenchel transform of a gauge: (γC)=δC(\gamma_C)^* = \delta_{C^\circ}.


NOTE. There is a more general definition of the polar transform on the class of nonnegative convex functions vanishing at 00:

k(y):=inf{μ0:x,y1+μk(x);xX}. k^\circ(y) := \inf\{ \mu \ge 0 : \langle x, y \rangle \le 1 + \mu k(x) ; \forall x \in X \}.

On this class of functions, the following diagram commutes (see Convex Analysis - Rockafellar - Corollary 15.5.1 - P.138):

γCγCδCδC \gamma_C \dashrightarrow \gamma_{C^\circ} \\ \downarrow \qquad\quad \downarrow \\ \delta_{C^\circ} \dashrightarrow \delta_{C}

where \dashrightarrow denotes the Polar transform and \downarrow denotes the Fenchel transform.


1. Polar of a Gauge

Fix μ>0\mu > 0. The condition

x,yμ,γC(x)x \langle x, y \rangle \le \mu, \gamma_C(x) \quad \forall x

is equivalent to checking it only on CC.

If xCx \in C, then γC(x)1\gamma_C(x) \le 1, hence

x,yμxC. \langle x, y \rangle \le \mu \quad \forall x \in C.

This is equivalent to

x,μ1y1xC, \langle x, \mu^{-1} y \rangle \le 1 \quad \forall x \in C,

i.e. μ1yC\mu^{-1} y \in C^\circ, or equivalently yμCy \in \mu C^\circ.

Therefore

(γC)(y)=inf{μ0:yμC}=γC(y). (\gamma_C)^\circ(y) =\inf\{ \mu \ge 0 : y \in \mu C^\circ \} =\gamma_{C^\circ}(y).


2. Fenchel Conjugate of a Gauge

Normalize any xx as

x=tc,t:=γC(x),cC. x = t c, \quad t := \gamma_C(x), \quad c \in C.

Then

x,yγC(x)t(c,y1). \langle x, y \rangle - \gamma_C(x) t(\langle c, y \rangle - 1).

Hence

(γC)(y)=supt0,;cCt(c,y1). (\gamma_C)^*(y) =\sup_{t \ge 0,; c \in C} t(\langle c, y \rangle - 1).

Case analysis

Case 1: yCy \notin C^\circ

Then there exists cCc \in C such that c,y>1\langle c, y \rangle > 1.

Letting t+t \to +\infty gives ++\infty.

Case 2: yCy \in C^\circ

Then

c,y1cC. \langle c, y \rangle \le 1 \quad \forall c \in C.

Hence t(c,y1)0t(\langle c, y \rangle - 1) \le 0 for all t0t \ge 0.

Taking t=0t = 0 yields value 00, so the supremum equals 00.


Conclusion

We obtain the compact formula

(γC)(y)={0,yC,+,yC, (\gamma_C)^*(y) = \begin{cases} 0, & y \in C^\circ, \\ +\infty, & y \notin C^\circ, \end{cases}

or equivalently

(γC)=δC. (\gamma_C)^* = \delta_{C^\circ}.

Popular Posts